ΎκΘwI ρZp€F Word Enumeration Science Laboratory
Language can be enumerated in science!
What it means "language can be enumerated in science"?
There is "existence and nought", "principle and phenomenon", "land and sea", "space and time(cosmos)", "sky and earth" in the words of japanese.
They are Antonyms in Japan.
And surprisingly, it is not in the grammar, it is possible to enumerate the science laws.
1: existence and nought
2: principle and phenomenon
3: space and time (cosmos)
4: sky and earth
5: land and sea
Why? What happened?
This is because, sky and earth, land and sea is a state that nought (zero) without you holds the physicalof dogma. In the established theory of quantum mechanics (physics) far from our general common sense,it believed that substance was present from the state that zero (nought). In other words, is thatprevious to the concept of zero (nought) -holds that "space and time (cosmos)", "sky and earth", "landand sea" are present.
It may to be a bit difficult, but I think I have heard the word "big bang". The universe is a dogma thatwas generated from the situation where nought (zero) to 15 billion years ago. People who doubt alsoseems to have pretty, but are actually as evidence that there was a "big bang" "Cosmic Microwavebackground radiation" is submitted. And since a still unlikely influential opinion to deny it "big bang" I willhave established theory of.
In other words, in this thing, it means that can list the order in which certain of the concept occurs.That is, in the condition that case list the laws of nature to grounds defined language in the order inwhich certain concept has occurred, I mean that the existence and nought is Retsube ahead in front ofthe space and time (cosmos), the sky and earth, the land and sea.
If what about "the principle and phenomenon" and "the existence and nought"? This is fraught withvery difficult problems in the physical world. Li in the universe holds, principle you always law exists.Principle (Law) it would be to say that giving birth to the universe. Nought (Zero) even there even atheory to be that it is the Principle (Law). However, there is a powerful theory that deny it. It is a theorythat the concept of non-physical, namely the principle (law) does not hold even there is a state of "completely nought (zero)". That is the theory that because there is a principle there is a state of "completely nought (zero)" to deny a situation where there is nothing. It is because to deny also theprinciple (law), the science does not forced to conclude that principle (law) is present after the conceptof the nohght (zero). That is to say that it is not forced to list the concept of "the principle andphenomenon" after the concept of "the existence and nought" from this thing.
So after the concept of "the existence and nought", what is true of the four remaining? The fourremaining, it is "principle and phenomenon", "land and sea", "space and time (cosmos)", "the sky andearth ".
Speaking earlier from the conclusion it is the principle and phenomenon. The universe is made up bysome principle (law). Was correlated demystify the principle (law) on human is the symbol of been law,such as the laws of physics. "The space and time (cosmos) "," the sky and earth "," the land and sea "is that it is made up by some principle (law). This suggests that" the space and time (cosmos) "," thesky and earth "," the land and sea "can list after the" the principle and phenomenon ".
1: "existence and nought", 2:. "Principle and phenomenon" was decided. What's next 2: "principle andphenomenon"?
Next, let's consider "land and sea". If "land and sea" is formed, the next time "space and time (cosmos)" was formed, it will not be physically well explained.To form a "land and sea", "Space and Time (cosmos)" should be present in advance.
In short, "space and time (cosmos)" exists, can physically description if "land and sea" was built in it.
From this fact, it is possible to list the "space and time (cosmos)" in front of "sky and earth" and "land and sea".
Let's further advance the discussion.Whether the "sky and earth", "land and sea" is? In the same wayof thinking as the previous, if there is no earth, land and sea is not built.Sea was built on Earth by the lawof gravitation of the earth, and built a land in places there is no water.
At that stage, it is also true that the sea has been formed by the law of meteorology.Even in that case,it should be the premise that the Earth is present ahead.
@Thus, as described above 1: existence and nought, 2: principle and phenomenon, 3: space and time(cosmos), 4: sky and earth, 5: land and sea, can list in this order.
@If there is universality in the list, and I would be satisfied as a theory by definition of theory.